I have a new article published at Bible and Interpretation. Here are some snippets:
Two months ago an article hit the media streams hard and fast, announcing that new artifacts had been discovered by a Bedouin containing the earliest known Christian writings, possibly even the words of the figure of Jesus himself.1 With a headline like that, anyone with even a modicum of academic interest in the historicity of the figure of Jesus would have looked over the article for any mention of a peer reviewed journal where they could read about the discovery, any translations of the script, or any dating methods used. To their dismay, they would have found nothing of the sort.
More scandalous is the complete lack of journalistic integrity, honest research, and thorough fact-checking. These codices might never have been heard of if the authors of the reports for BBC and Fox News (among others) had just checked with the academic community before publishing the “find”. At the very least, the journalists might have used less authoritative language, expressed more caution, and exposed the controversy rather than simply stating, as if doing so made it fact, that these codices were “the earliest Christian texts” and that they held “early images of Jesus.”
Many thanks to those involved in the email group for their useful contributions not only to this article but to the investigation into these lead codices as well. Everyone dedicated a lot of time and effort over the past few months and it has definitely paid off.
Filed under: Archaeology, Belief, Biblioblogging, Blog Memes, Early Christianity, Jesus, Life, Minimalism, Scholarship, Society Tagged: | codices, David Elkington, Jordan, lead codices, lead tablets, Paul Elkington, pseudo-archaeology, pseudo-scholarship