In a conversation about this post, someone remarked to me that god made man in his own image. There are a lot of implications to this position, but the most troubling for me is the concept of original sin and free will. So god creates man in the image of himself (so his pattern), but man has the ability to sin. Ergo god has the ability to sin (because we’re made from his pattern). It also implies (a) god is not perfect (we are not perfect), (b) god can be evil (we can be evil), (c) god can make mistakes (we make mistakes), and so on.
But perhaps the most troubling position here is the rather absurd way god is portrayed. That is to say, god is portrayed as a vindictive megalomaniac with serious social and commitment issues. Think about the Genesis account: God makes the world, god makes man, god tells man he is ruler over the other living things on earth so long as he does not commit sin (eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil) even though god made the tree and made man with the ability to eat from the tree. Does god create Satan or does he share the same preexistence as god? Either way, god creates woman, Satan convinces woman to eat from the tree, woman convinces man to eat from the tree (that god put there), man and woman commit sin, god casts them out from paradise with all these problems (pain during childbirth, working the soil and toiling for survival, etc…).
Now, let me situate this in an analogy focusing on one aspect of creation; that is to say, the idea of creation itself. Suppose you have all the powers of god for a moment. You decide to create a Ford truck. But what you really want is a Cadillac. You can’t blame the truck. So then you scrap the truck and make another truck, but this time you give it the ability to change into a Cadillac–but then it doesn’t do that, it stays a truck. Still, it isn’t the truck’s fault! You created the damn thing as a truck! Finally, let’s say you scrap the truck, create another truck with the ability to change into a Cadillac, and then try to show it all the amazing benefits it would have it would just change into a Cadillac–and if it doesn’t change into a Cadillac you’re going to burn it in hell for all eternity. But despite your pettiness and threatening tone, the truck remains a truck and in the end you’ve only proven you are a hopeless megalomaniac with sadistic tendencies. You still cannot blame the truck–if you wanted a Cadillac so badly, you just should have made a Cadillac.
If that isn’t twisted enough, how about the whole ‘temptation’ bit in the forest? Consider this carefully now and don’t just react to what I’m saying. Give it some thought while reading this analogy.
Let’s say your a parent. You bake a batch of cookies and place them on the kitchen counter. You then take your 4 year old and put them in the kitchen and, before leaving, you tell them to not eat the cookies from the cookie jar. They have free reign of the kitchen, but they can’t eat from the cookie jar. Then you walk out and lock the child and the cookies in the kitchen behind you.
Now let’s take a moment to reflect: 4 year old, kitchen, cookie jar (not tucked away in some cabinet, but sitting in a reachable position). Let’s also presume that you have omniscient powers (like god is supposed to have, according to the bible, e.g., “…for God is greater than our hearts, and he knows everything.” [1 John 3.20] and”The Lord certainly knows everything that people do; he knows their imaginations and their thoughts and their hearts.” [2 Esdras 16:54]). So you knew that if you left the cookie jar there full of fresh cookies, your 4 year old would open it up and eat a cookie.
That is just what happens, too. The child goes over to the cookie dish, eats a cookie, and you burst into the kitchen and you say, ‘well, guess you’re doomed to a lifetime of toil and, by the way, you’re going to burn for eternity.’ And then you shove your 4 year old into an oven.
Too harsh? I agree. But this is the story of the Genesis account. Adam and Eve, who had no knowledge of good and evil (so, they were essentially innocent) and had just been created like five minutes before Satan showed up, committed a very forgivable act (eating fruit from the tree) and instead of doing the logical thing (you know, like removing the tree or putting it out of reach–like make it float or hover twenty feet up–or just not creating the damn tree in the first place) he places the tree within reach and gives creates evil and creates Satan (presumably) and allows all of this to happen even though he knew it was going to happen (because the Dude is all powerful and all knowing). And still damns man to a lifetime of toil and also misery after death (the Christian view of Hell, for our modern audience).
The most interesting bit though, he could have created Adam and Eve with the ability to not sin. And since he is god, all powerful, he could have done it so it wouldn’t influence our free will. He could have created us with the ability to be free without committing murder; we already have limited free will (we can;t just sprout wings and fly, even if we want to do that). So why not give us, say, wings and not give us the ability to commit murder? Seems rather odd, right? If he wanted Adam to not sin, then he should have created a being that couldn’t sin. It is patently absurd–in fact everything about free will and original sin is absurd. And if you are still following at this point, you can see why I feel that way.